That’s not an argument.
If I say it. It’s because I depend on the science to do so.
The opposing argument isn’t 22, it’s that it’s thru 25 or 26. Yet I can’t find evidence it’s meaningful and increasingly predictive at that point.
Source date (UTC): 2023-04-13 12:54:03 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1646496973980139521
Reply addressees: @ALawfare @nianello6
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1646496141880483840
Leave a Reply