That’s jumping the gun. 😉 We have created the formal logic. Training one of the

That’s jumping the gun. 😉
We have created the formal logic. Training one of the LLMs to respect it is a project we are just in the beginning stages of planning. 😉
And that’s going to take a bit.
Why? LLMs are pretty good at language prediction, but not so much logical dependency (though it’s improving daily).
However, our operational logic, though in ordinary language, is structurally equal to a programming language (by design).
As such given that LLMs can do a fair job of programming, our expectation is that they can do an equal or better job (with training) of testimony, reciprocity, proportionality, and as such, manners, ethics, morals, and natural law.
And from there describe the difference between natural law and positive law (unnatural law).
If you research our history you’ll see that we’ve been planning this for over a decade (we own the https://t.co/Vr5lNEGDPY domain name for this purpose.)
So, it took me (and us) nearly twenty years to unite the sciences into a single universally commensurable paradigm, logic, vocabulary and grammar of the four sciences (logic, physical, behavioral, evolutionary).

Reply addressees: @erogncict