(Mostly. But not completely. Problem: what if the unambiguous prose itself is th

(Mostly. But not completely. Problem: what if the unambiguous prose itself is the profound idea itself? Math, Formal Logic, Programming, the formal operational logic of law. 🙁 )
While I want to agree, that complexity can be explained incrementally in conventional language – sufficiently to ‘get the gist’, it’s simply not true that the grammar of some ideas is reducible to ordinary language enough to understand and use.)