It’s very hard to ‘science’ that set of sentences, since the terms are themselve

It’s very hard to ‘science’ that set of sentences, since the terms are themselves pseudoscientific. Instead there is a tendency of christian sects to vary by trinitarian metaphysics, giving priority differently to each vertex. But if we science this trinity it’s a reflection of trifunctionalism, which is a reflection of the sex differences, and in turn the equilibration of the universe. So Instead of that abstraction, if we science the method of argument: theology/pilpul, sophistry/philosophy, dialectical materialism/critique, vs testimony/science etc, what we end up with is the masculine vs feminine spectrum of truth to deceit, and just a spectrum of means of lying. So it doesn’t matter what people claim, it matters more the method of how they claim it. And they claim it mostly to lie.