It’s a combination of IQ, morals, truth-before-face, and knowledge that you’d do

It’s a combination of IQ, morals, truth-before-face, and knowledge that you’d don’t have. You’d have to claim anything I said was false (it isn’t). And that I wasn’t trying to solve the great problem of the age (I am). And that the solutions I’ve proposed don’t do so (they do). And to make such a claim, you’d have to demonstrate competency, to hold those positions (you don’t and I’m quite sure you can’t.) Worse you’d have to claim I don’t criticize every group for their latent cultural criminality ( I do).
And it’s most likely you’d virtue signal virtue you don’t have (you are), and that you’re granting special privileges and special pleading to cover the expansion of female anti-social behavior in norms and that the intellectuals who formed this justification for anti-social behavior, especially behavioral pseudoscience, were’t almost exclusively jewish, and from the jewish ethic and moral tradition, and that such moral tradition isn’t an application of the feminine social, cognitive and reproductive strategy (weakness). All of which you’d fail to achieve.
We didn’t like Darwin’s consequence on god. We won’t like my work on ‘the feminine’ for the same reason.
It’s still true, whether we like it or not.
I do truth, for the tiny minority that desires the truth.
And in truth, they are all that matter.
The herd of lie-followers don’t.

Reply addressees: @thenewMJG