The left has only one techinque. The same technique women have used to undermine men since the dawn of time:
“Seduction by Baiting into Hazard”
The Female > Abrahamic > Marxist sequence
How many women in divorce court today provoke men intentionally into physical force, then claim they are victims?
What is the left doing to the conservatives and the government? Why are the government and the right accused of authoritarianism when they police the commons against the left. And why do we oddly have any sense of guilt about it. Yet the right can protest and it strikes fear into the hearts of government and the left?
The question is rather odd really: why do we put up with the feminine-left false oppression narrative, when in both cases we are correcting female anti-social behavior by social economic and political harm, but suppress male anti-social behavior by physical harm?
Wny do we pander to women and the left?
Is it culture or instinct? It appears to be animal instinct. Becuase it’s irrational on its face.
WHy is ‘masculine policing of the commons’ even vaguely considered authoritarian when the entire purpose of the feminine and the left is baiting into hazard: ‘the crime of construction’ just like in the inverse they egage in deceit by ‘social construction’.
Seduction > Baiting Into Hazard > Social Construction of A Falsehood > Under cover of what? Pretense of innocence? Incompetence?
Why do we permit feminine crime and not masculine?
Biology we need to ‘counter’.
That’s why I worked on the law, to equally suppress feminine criminality as we have suppressed masculine.
Reply addressees: @ConceptualJames
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-15 15:33:41 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636027899714187266
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636022835008208896
Leave a Reply