Ugh. (a) social pseudoscience. (b) economists are aught that people report false

Ugh. (a) social pseudoscience. (b) economists are aught that people report falsely, that almost all surveys and models fail replication, that they contrive their results, that sample sizes are too small, and that the samples rely on student volunteers most likely to virtue signal. This survey isn’t public, doesn’t state it’s N, and is constructed.
Ergo: we use the opposite model of demonstrated preference in voting or economy. OR what I do, use social media to create a kink of the hill game, and provoke a moral outrage and record the logic by which individuals attempt to conduct deception or coercion in favor of their biases. Linguistic analysis is the most successful method to day of determining intelligence and personality, moral biases, and in my case … how people lie to themselves and others.