“THE CRIME OF DISAPPROVAL OUT OF IGNORANCE” I can source all claims. Though it’s

“THE CRIME OF DISAPPROVAL OUT OF IGNORANCE”
I can source all claims. Though it’s an extraordinary amount of work. I keep a reading and reference list for that purpose. But I have no reason to do work when there is no evidence that your disapproval is backed by sources and claims. Ergo: if you want to object, you’re welcome to do so with sources and claims, and since you did the work, I can morally respond reciprocally with work myself. Otherwise you’re trying to ‘steal’ my time by false accusation. And because you’re human, and don’t know what you’re doing is coercive and intellectually dishonest, you’ll just make nonsense arguments unless you’re sufficiently informed to hold the discussion. ie: Don’t disapprove of what you can’t argue gainst. Disapproval isn’t argument. If you can’t argue against the matter with substance then you should also understand why you shouldn’t have an opinion on the matter. And you certainly should’t urinate on other’s firehydrants uninvited if you shouldn’t even have an opinion on the matter.

In matters of truth or falsehood:
Argument: systematizing (adult, human).
-vs-
Approval/Disapproval: empathizing (child, animal)

It’s not complicated.
(And no you don’t get a participation trophy either.)