PEOPLE WILL ABSOLUTELY RESPOND NEGATIVELY TO THE RESULTS OF MY WORK. (JUST LIKE

PEOPLE WILL ABSOLUTELY RESPOND NEGATIVELY TO THE RESULTS OF MY WORK. (JUST LIKE DARWIN)
I fully realize a lot of what I do is difficult to comprehend. I can only write for a certain audience.

Why?
Imagine it’s 1750.
Darwin travels back in time just 100 years, and uses the word evolution and explains it. Same problem.

We still have vast numbers of the world who not only don’t understand evolution, but don’t believe, it or that it’s possible. And passionately.

Why should I be any different if I’m just taking darwin to its complete and logical conclusion, uniting the sciences?

Breaking the long history of thinking of everyone as the same, into everyone is a variation in the distribution of male to female OPPOSITES in perception, cognition, valuation, want, and language is kind of a big leap that answers most of the present hard questions in the world.

But why would you think I’d get less hostile a reaction for that innovation than darwin did for his -and while Darwin’s work had social and religious implications, my work has psychological, political, and economic implications.

People will respond negatively to my work more so than darwin’s. Especially the left who it exposes as even greater purveyors of superstition and false promise than religions ever did.
…