“Q: Why have observers questioned the viability of the United States-led global

“Q: Why have observers questioned the viability of the United States-led global order?”

THE ONE CORRECT (UNPLEASANT) ANSWER
(repost)
“Despite trying to create a Smithian world order of peace and trade, the authoritarian civilizations governments will not surrender their corruption and rent-seeking, and so we are reverting to the conflict of civilizations and the high cost of trade.”

1 – The US global order, requires the USA (a) to sacrifice its middle, lower middle, working, and laboring classes (b) and its industrial base (b) to pay for policing the world’s transport and trade (the seas, the air), (c) and to provide a world currency eliminating the frictions of currency trade (d) creating relatively stable prices (e) insulating as much as possible against local crises (f) in order to raise the world out of ignorance, superstition, hard labor, poverty, starvation, disease, suffering, child mortality, early death.

2 – (g) thereby ending the claims that (h) authoritarian governments (i) authoritarian economies (j) empires, are superior to (k) rule of law of reciprocity (property), (l) participatory governments (m) federations of nation-states (n) long enough to complete the transition from agrarianism to industrial technological modernity.

3 – The USA can no longer afford to do this, because (o) the American middle, lower middle, working, and laboring classes have run out of tolerance for redistributing their wealth and reproduction to the developing world. And ( p) the economic advantage of the american economy has been eliminated sufficiently that we can no longer afford to police the world system of transport and trade.

4 – And this is because just as we learned from colonialism, we learned from globalization “ all other peoples can’t do ‘whiteness’ because it’ requires too much individual responsibility for peoples other than Europeans”. As such, as demonstrated by the middle east, Russia, China, and now retrenching India, that we can only distribute our technology, but we cannot distribute our cultural institutions.

5 – Domestically the Class Marxists moved from Europe and Russia to America in the 1950’s and converted Class Marxism to Race Marxism, and Cultural Marxism (neo-marxism-postmodernism) and began the march through the institutions of cultural production as they destroyed those institutions in Europe and Russia. So America is now as internally unstable as other countries. That instability is only ameliorated by debt spending. And America is running out of the capacity for debt spending, now that the world order that Americans created is collapsing.

6 – The answer is that (q) the world is rejecting our rule of law, because of the decadency it tolerated under race and cultural marxism ( r) the world is retaining what western technology that they can adopt. (s) the world is reverting to their traditional forms of government (t) the world is returning to each ‘civilization or state’ will need to police its own trade (u) the world economy will collapse into starvation on a scale not seen since the great plagues and famines (v) America will be fine because it’s an island, and resource-autarkic. (w) and America will begin to benefit from world disorder, trade problems, and warfare.

That’s really what’s going to happen.

Realistically: other cultures are not able to ‘do whiteness’ because they cannot create the rule of law necessary to create the trust necessary to overcome historical cultural norms traditions and values.