“Q: CURT WHY THE EMPHASIS ON TRIFUNCTIONALISM?” (bookmark)(core) Well, nature ha

“Q: CURT WHY THE EMPHASIS ON TRIFUNCTIONALISM?”
(bookmark)(core)

Well, nature has a hard problem beginning in the quantum background, and it solves it with velocity(spin) resulting in positive, negative, and equilibriuim. There is nothing in the unverse that violates this model – there can’t be. Everything in the universe is constructed from it.
So we see this same rule throughout material, all life, and all of mankind, and most imporantly it the three possible means of human coercion: Physical, Social, and Reciprocal.
Then we see it as large scale in organizing principles of state, religion, and contract(law). And we see it incomparative civilization as means of competition between races expressed in the various possible path dependences between state, religion, contract(law) institutions. And finally we see it in logic as undecidable, possibly true, and definitely false, and in all language that follows the same rules.

There are only twenty something rules like this.
And all of existence is explained by them.
That is why, we make such an emphasis on trifuctionalism, as well as continuous recursive disambiguation, which is the means by which the universe defeats entropy (pressure spatial expansion) with negative entropy (concentration in mass), and the P-Method of disambiguation by enumeration, serialization, disambiguation, operationalization, of all terms into a system of ordinal measurement, within those rules.

It might seem a lot at the beginning, but it’s the universe’s programming language. Not math. Why? Mathematical reducibility is smaller than computational reducibility. 😉

Cheers
Curt Doolittle
The Natural Law Institute