Well, that’s simply not true. Compare Jewish and Anglo ethics. And Jewish and An

Well, that’s simply not true. Compare Jewish and Anglo ethics. And Jewish and Anglo industries. And Jewish and Anglo wealth origins. And Jewish and Anglo innovation. And Jewish and Anglo Governments. And Jewish and Anglo truthfulness, and Trustworthiness. Jewish and anglo philosophy. Jewish and anglo law. And then Jewish (cosmopolitan heterogenous low trust authoritarian feminine) and anglo (total market, homogeneous, high trust, reciprocal, masculine) group strategies.

That comparison among others is telling.
We live in an era where verbal acuity is more rewarded than at any time in history. Where finanicalism and baiting into hazard are most licensed in history. And where suppression of sedition is least practiced in history. This age is a luxury of Christian ethics and the hole in law created by European trifunctionalism’s tolerance of political competition. And combined with the introduction of women in to workforce and polity at the same time as Jewish (feminine competitive and conflict strategy)

We have simply failed to outlaw the female means of anti-social, anti-political, anti-cultural sedition and treason as thoroughly as we have outlawed the masculine versions. But the ‘feminine experiemnt’ is coming to an end, and we have learned how to reform our laws to eliminate feminine seditino and warfare as we have masculine.

So, what’s happening at the moment is the great Jewish DISPLACEMENT from the academy and government, is following the great white displacement – because Jews opened the door to Jewish feminine verbal CREDENTIALISM over anglo masculine existential DEMONSTRATED COMPETENCY in military and industry. And that only occurred because of anglo Christian moral conviction, and especially anglo aristocratic tradition of aristocratic egalitarianism. (rotation)

As far as I know, there are only two of us in the world who understand these subjects at extraordinary depth. I’m probably a bit better at explaining it.

But you know, there is a reason Jews have failed at large-scale organizational construction, military construction, state construction, artistic, and mechanical, engineering, and technical innovation. And only began contributing to science when the franchise was opened. Yet Jews immediately began to undermine by producing the entire corpus of behavioral social and economic and legal pseudoscience that are the source of 19th and 20th conflicts both domestic and foreign.

So perhaps we would like to see something positive other than Einstien (who along with Bohr re-platonized mathematics and so he harmed as much as he helped.)

Anglos invented the modern state, rule of law by the natural law, and the agrarian, transportation, commercial, financial, scientific, industrial, and technological revolution within decades of the printing press and literacy. Jews contribute nothing to mankind despite literacy (other than subculture as organized crime syndicate by baiting into hazard).

Our core competency is civilization by trust formation.
Can you make the same claim?

We all know better.
But then the evolutionary conflict between Masculine systematizing over time and truth before face, and feminine empathizing in time and face before truth continues.

We don’t have a problem overcoming our sins.
Why do you? Feminine intolerance for self-reflection and subsequent adaptation?

Genetics in everything.

-Cheers