I can’t figure out what TTM’s trying to argue because he keeps suggesting rather

I can’t figure out what TTM’s trying to argue because he keeps suggesting rather than explaining his way into it. This might help with people who don’t know better, but we specialize in language, logics, grammars, and especially the grammars of falsehood and lying.

So we already know what we’re talking about. What we need is a theory to test. And so far all we’ve seen is postmodern neologism to claim differences that don’t exist, novelties that don’t exist, and so far it’s just another language game.

So, what’s the theory?

There is absolutely zero chance I won’t understand it. That might sound ostentatious but it’s just a painful truth. I know my domains of ignorance because they are my domains of disinterest. But epistemically, I don’t think there is anyone on the planet even close.
And that’s a bad thing. ‘Cause it’s one of the reasons we are where we are.