I don’t know really. Because none of my followers that interact with me, have said such a thing, or fail to grasp that whenever I say anything about female->feminine->Mixed <-Masculine<- Male that we’re talking about distributions (in other words, we intrinsically understand Distributions vs NAXALTs.).
So, if “most of my followers” believe such a thing that would be …. odd. They couldn’t then be ‘followers’. They’d have to be pretty much drive-by raiders. ๐ Not that it would mean you were wrong. ๐
Why? Because our first principle of intersexual cooperation is the falsehood of the ideal type, and instead the equilibrium between the sexes given our opposing interests and the necessity of exchanges to reach that equilibrium.
So I think I’ll post a long-running poll to see if they do understand (or not).
That’d be interesting. (I don’t really know the answer.)
Thanks for the nudge. ๐
-hugs
Source date (UTC): 2023-02-28 01:07:36 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1630374123842031616
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1630366453118509057
Leave a Reply