ACCUATION: “You consider yourself an educator? You’re the worst kind of white su

ACCUATION: “You consider yourself an educator?
You’re the worst kind of white suprematist.”

That I’m an educator? It’s just a demonstrable fact. I’m spending time and effort educating you and the audience right now.

That I’m a white supremacist? No, I’m not a white supremacist. I might be a classist (I am) because the problem of race conflict is largely a problem of class conflict, and race differences are largely a difference in the size of the lower and underclasses. So like most people I’m concerned about the behavior of the lower classes. (Genetic load tends to accumulate in the lower classes.)

I might say science is better than all the non-scientific alternatives. I might say ‘whiteness’ is the closest to behavioral science that’s possible by man. I might say ‘whiteness’ as a civilizational model is superior to all others currently known by man. I might be able to say why it is superior to all others known by man. And I might say that it’s very difficult to adopt without the significant effort of full integration.

But as for white people, the data is what it is. Genetically, the east Asians and the Ashkenazi have better statistics than we do. Biologically we are stronger than other races, but East Asians will live longer and Africans can endure more physical stress. So I’m not in favor of white superiority, or white supremacy. I’m in favor of whiteness because the science says ‘whiteness’ as civilizational order is the best man can achieve.

It’s just that whiteness is HARD. Because it requires trust and trustworthiness. And, you know, outside of Japanese, Koreans, and Europeans, that pretty much doesn’t happen in the world. Europeans practice truth before face, duty before self, and defense of the commons before all. It’s very hard to do that. That’s why Europe is a vast open-air museum and the rest of the world isn’t.

Cheers
Curt