THE ANTI-FEMINIST TAKE? –“Were you oppressed? Or were the vast majority of wome

THE ANTI-FEMINIST TAKE?
–“Were you oppressed? Or were the vast majority of women irrational, impulsive, emotional, selfish, greedy, hyper-consuming, attention-seeking, virtue signaling, seditious, treasonous, socially poisonous whores, unfit to raise the children (boys) necessary to create the discipline, selflessness, capitalization, and commons necessary for society, culture, and civilization? I mean, look at western women today. They’re the freest to express themselves in civilizational history, and demonstrate every day that women are, after all, Pandoras – the origin of all the world’s evils?”–

See? We can take the extreme position too.

Men and women domesticated each other into the Pareto and Nash optimums for both, which produced the best for the most – and there is no alternative unless we develop artificial wombs. And in that case, it turns out, that men are better parents than women, and women are often better workers – at least where strength isn’t involved. So why not have men gravitate to capitalizing by raising families, societies, and polities and women work for their consumption? I mean. That turns into a cycle of history, doesn’t it? Returning us to our original form?

The point is that you can’t hyper-consume without hyper-capitalizing, which together cancel one another out, ending hyper-everything.