THE NAZI TROPE (GODWIN’S LAW) IS EXHAUSTED (Countersignaling) National Socialism

THE NAZI TROPE (GODWIN’S LAW) IS EXHAUSTED
(Countersignaling)
National Socialism was a counter-revolution against World Communism: the communist total war (secularization of abrahamic religion) against nations.
– As an ideology of national total war against world communism’s total war against nations, it was innovative, effective, useful, and without American intervention, would likely have been successful, at least eventually, had it succeeded.
– Note that small homogenous nation-states are high-trust polities, that constantly advance in the economy, science, technology, rights, and privileges – and large diverse religious or ideological empires are low-trust polities that stagnate (middle east, India, China).
– So regardless of whether communism, socialism leftism, progressivism, American liberalism, all small ethnocentric nation-states produce the optimum political order with the lowest power distance, highest trust, and most redistribution. And the only reason for scale is because you are untrustworthy or other parties are untrustworthy so you don’t trust one another – because you have not developed the high trust of small homogenous nation-states.
– Camps and Gulags are the Nazi trope, like Slavery is the American Trope, or Colonialism is the European trope – when these are common practices by every civilization in history. And even these practices among christian europeans were superior to all world alternatives.
– Everyone from National Socialists, to Communists and the British and the Anglosphere used concentration camps starting well before the world wars. For all intents and purposes, ghettos, ‘quarters’, the west bank, and the meany dislocated tent-cities today are the equivalent. And during the age of nation-states, where people relocated to their home regions, relocation was necessary to produce high-trust homogenous polities capable of democratic rule of law governments.
– Given that communism and National Socialism are simply means of conducting ‘total war’ – just as we have seen communism fail outside of total warfare conditions, national socialism would have devolved into french or german democratic socialism (mixed economies) as we have seen in the postwar era. Simply because without the threat of conquest or war, people will naturally restore their self-interest during peace as they do their collective interest during war.
– The french invented what we would call democratic socialism, and just called it socialism – governing well. The Marxists made it extremist and authoritarian – warfare instead of just governing. The nazis reacted by creating opposition to communism with greater authority to conduct warfare while maintaining the french morals.
– So I’m getting close to saying just “The nazis were mostly right, and they weren’t as wrong as the communists, and you’re just a clown for thinking otherwise.”
– Worse, what is the difference between militant communism, and subversive, seditious, left-wing liberalism other than the rate of conquest? The masculine force of communism replaced by the feminine seduction of communism. Both are suicidal. There is no difference.
-FIN-