Again, and I know this is a hurdle, you can communicate ideas through theology o

Again, and I know this is a hurdle, you can communicate ideas through theology or mythologically, through philosophy or sophistry, thru pilpul and critique or essay and analysis, thru magic or pseudoscience through literature or history, through science and constructive logic, or any combination thereof.

The question is only which of those vehicles increases or decreases the opportunity for falsehood, suggestion, deceit, and fraud.

Unfortunately to reach computation (the use of science, testimony and logic to produce an operational means of communication) requires great knowledge, while every other method requires less and less, and relies more and more on analogy, suggestion, and pretense of knowledge.

So the method of teaching while it may allow greater suggestion to a broader audience will also allow deception.

CRT consists of abrahamic pilpul and critique, which seeks only consensus the way idealsm and sophistry seek some sort of truth upon which we can agree. Furthermore while idealism and sophistry in the western tradition generally favor advocacy of something openly stated (Male means of manipulation), pilpul and critique seek to undermine what is, to bring about something else entirely, indirectly (female means of manipulation)/