As you mean it, of course I’d agree. As necessary, I wish it were true. It’s not

As you mean it, of course I’d agree.
As necessary, I wish it were true. It’s not.
All language consists of a stream of measurements resulting in a continuous reduction of ambiguity.
All disciplines require domain-specific vocabulary.
Universal commensurability across all domains requires we disambiguate sets of domain-specific vocabulary.
The result is a vocabulary that consists of unambiguous measurements across all domains.
This is necessary, if we are trying to construct a science that can identify describe, explain and as a consequence prevent the mass production of lying that has plagued the industrial age.
So just as you must learn to read, must learn mathematics, must learn physics, chemistry, biology, engineering, economics, law et al, the solution to matters of ethics and politics, psychological and social science, requires learning terms that prevent the rapid expansion of not only lying but pseudoscience.
This is the research and development that our organization performs.
And it’s for moral ends for the benefit of all.
-Cheers