YOUR INTENTIONS FRAME YOUR OUTCOMES AS DOES YOUR METHODOLOGY The unconscious rea

YOUR INTENTIONS FRAME YOUR OUTCOMES AS DOES YOUR METHODOLOGY

The unconscious reason that caused me to solve the outstanding hard problems in what we call philosophy, is my initial motivation was to provide a truthful, value-neutral, language of ethics and politics. So I solved for true and neutral – not good. A logic of truth, not good.

From truth, you can then produce non-false goods.
By presuming a good, wIthout truth first, you can justify (false) means of claiming you can produce goods.

Good point of clarity for new followers: Technically speaking I’m an epistemologist and logician. My only primary research is in epistemology(truth) and logic(calculating really). I read other people’s primary research and synthesize it by making it commensurable. That’s all.

I should add that it’s not obvious, that my work on the grammars, and particularly on lying, and sex differences in lying, is primary research that to my knowledge hasn’t been developed before, and is a net contribution. It’s just a contribution that a lotta people won’t like. 😉